|
|
More Massaleit Civilians Die in Arab
Militia Attacks in Western Sudan (4/25/2000)
The recent changes in the Sudanese National Islamic Front
(NIF) regime, which have been lauded in domestic and international
political circles, have not been matched by significant human
rights improvements in western Sudan . The marauding Arab militias
continue to wreck havoc on the security of Massaleit civilians
as they have done for the past two years, causing thousands
of refugees to flee to other places within and outside the
Sudan . These militias have continued to perpetuate serious
human rights violations despite the deployment of large numbers
of government soldiers purportedly to restore peace. Early
this year, two attacks by Arab militias against the Massaleit
caused the deaths of scores of civilians and huge losses of
property.
In the first attack, in early February 2000, four persons
returning to their villages from Geneina, the capital of Western
Dar Fur State , were attacked and killed by militia members.
One of the dead Massaleit was returning to the village of Murne
, about 5 miles south of Geneina. The other victims were returning
to villages to the east of Geneina, one to the village of Duet
and the other two to the villages of Berte and Kuka.
In the second attack, at the end of February 2000, more than
fifty persons from the Massaleit village of Geriko , located
to the north of the town of Foroboranga on Sudan 's border
with the Central African Republic , were killed by the militias.
Militiamen also set many houses ablaze and stole a large herd
of livestock. Not surprisingly, the victims of the attack were
predominantly Massaleit civilians although some members of
minority African groups (including Fur, Dagu and Senyar) living
in the village suffered casualties. The attackers rode horses
and carried automatic machine guns and other deadly weapons.
At the conclusion of their attack they split into two groups
that escaped in separate directions, one group rode eastwards
in the direction of Nyala, the capital of Southern Dar Fur
State, and the other group moved towards Chad . However, these
movements seem to have been intended to distract attention
away from the attackers ultimate destination at Wade Saleh.
Wade Saleh is a group of formerly Fur villages close to Jebel
Marra which have been settled by Arab militiamen and their
families following the eviction or flight of the original non-Arab
inhabitants during the brutal conflicts of the late 1980s between
the Fur and Arab ethnic groups. In 1989, an attack on Danbar,
one of the villages in the Wade Saleh, left 226 people dead
from the non-Arab population. Many people were unaccounted
for following this incident and more than likely found themselves
forced into servitude. A Fur child abducted by the Messiriya
Arabs reappeared 8 years later to recount his sojourns in Chad
and stories about his captors' attempts to change his identity.
The Arabization of Wade Saleh, formerly known as Gar Sila
when it was populated by numerous ethnic groups of which the
largest was the Fur, was an expression of a broader and deliberate
policy to alter the ethnic composition of the area at the expense
of the non-Arab ethnic groups. This process of ethnic cleansing
was encouraged by the government to undermine and intimidate
the non-Arab population of Western Sudan because the government
suspected that the non-Arab population sympathized and supported
the armed anti-government rebels. When an SPLA force under
the command of Daoud Bolad infiltrated into Wade Saleh in 1991,
the Sudanese government army relied heavily on the active support
of local Arab militias to defeat the rebels. This government-Arab
militia alliance has continued to hold and it prevents the
government, despite its claims to the contrary, from playing
the role of the honest arbiter in the ongoing conflict in Western
Sudan .
The bias of the government is easy to discern. During the
recent conflicts between the Massaleit and the Arab militias,
government soldiers disarmed the Massaleit but not the Arab
militias, creating a completely one-sided balance of power.
Moreover, the government infringed upon the traditional leadership
structure of the region. Many Massaleit Emirs, Omdas and Shiekhs
were replaced by Arabs, which resulted in interethnic tensions
and ultimately violence. Having installed puppet local leadership,
the government proceeded to push through controversial policies
without fear of significant retribution. For example, fictitious
and backdated land ownership documents were issued to Arab
occupiers of lands belonging to peoples who had been ethnically
cleansed. It is unlikely that the return of peace would change
this new fait accompli because the original owners of these
lands, if they were able to return, might not have the evidences
to challenge these 'facts' before a prejudiced administration.
The implementation of these policies took place in an atmosphere
of disinformation by the government-controlled media through
agents of the state or the official party. Perhaps the most
explicit example of the government's use of the media to promote
its racist agenda was the pronouncements of the Sudanese Minister
of Interior, Mr. Abdel Rahim Muhammad Hussein, at the beginning
of the conflict between the Arabs and the Massaleit. Hussein
announced to the media in early 1998 that the Massaleit had
become fifth columnists who had killed all the Arab Omdas in
western Dar Fur. The result of the racist and malicious propaganda
was obvious; Arabs in other places inside or outside the country
rushed to rescue their kinsmen from annihilation. Thousands
of people were killed, maimed or evicted from their homes.
The mass media actively misrepresented the scale of the suffering,
downplaying the level of conflict and downsizing the casualties.
For instance, in the aftermath of the recent attacks, the media
characterized the events as a fight in western Dar Fur between
a herdsman and a farmer in which one of them died but the situation
was brought under control. Such false information is often
difficult to counter because of the remoteness of the region
and the restrictions of government policy constrain access
by international NGOs and independent monitors. Even the telephone
access to Geneina is noticeably more difficult following periods
of serious breaches of security.
The recent behavior of the Arab militias against the Massaleit
civilians casts doubts on any change in the government stance
towards human rights. These militias operate with the backing
and in tandem with government soldiers deployed in western
Sudan to restore peace. There is a strong need to focus attention
on the actions of the government and the Arab militias in western
Sudan .
|